Audio Reviews - In Time - Audio Review

Tags:  movie review, audio, spill, spill.com, in time, justin timberlake, amanda seyfried

• 
  

  August 28, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Keith Ackerson said ...

  @NeoXvss yes I did but then again the movie (badly) ripped from a ton of other movies. I'm so disappointed that this is by the same guy who did Gattaca 

• November 08, 2011 at 5:12 AM, said ...

  Does anyone notice is movie is a sucky version of Logan's Run ....

  
  
• 
  

  November 02, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Nedan said ...

  The Coleman family reunion produced by David Cronenberg

• November 01, 2011 at 9:16 PM, said ...

  Zach De La Rocha should have been casted as the lead role!

  
  
• 
  

  October 31, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Keith Ackerson said ...

  you guys had me right up to the Equlibrium comparison (no emotions yet everyone is running around screaming in fear and power hungry?)

   

  Other than that, I full on agree with you, actually I had the same feelings when I caught a screener of the flick. Definitely a low rental if not a catch-it-on-cable

   

   

• October 31, 2011 at 3:34 PM, said ...

  Your crazy for this one

   

  
  
• 
  

  October 30, 2011 at 11:06 PM, justin whitman said ...

  

• October 30, 2011 at 8:59 PM, legend26 said ...

  olivia wilde just needs to get naked in my bedroom already, dammit.

  
  
• 
  

  October 30, 2011 at 5:17 PM, StanPowder said ...

  Great ideas get ruined when Timberlake is playing the lead lol.  And it doesn't matter what anyone says, but JT is a terrible actor, and he should stop mentioning and brown-nosing that he grew up with Ryan Gosling in the Mickey Mouse Club, he became a cool solid actor, while JT became a member of a boy-band with bad taste in music, and looks or not your still a wuss lol.  Besides JT and Seyfried, the rest of the cast got screwed but atleast they ran off with a paycheque and can move on to finding something better lol.

• October 30, 2011 at 4:28 PM, said ...

  this movie is just bad....

  
  
• 
  

  October 30, 2011 at 6:56 AM, said ...

  Decent enough. Left a shitload of questions unanswered, though.

• October 30, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Haron Dick said ...

  Ass for time, ass for motherfucking time.

   

  
  
• 
  

  October 30, 2011 at 2:27 AM, C.H. Gorog said ...

  I'm so sad that this movie didn't live up to expectations :( It's between a rental for me. I would love to see a remake of this movie a decade or so down the line by a director and writer who can make the most out of this story. It's tragic to see that Andrew Niccol (the writer and director of freaking Gattaca) couldn't make the most out of this story.

   

  @Markezzo - A few, but nothing groan worthy. It's not like someone just yells out "a stitch in time saves nine" or that, but there are some word-plays on time.

• October 30, 2011 at 12:42 AM, said ...

  Did anyone else here that weird fuzzing noise in the review? Kinda like a TV fuzzing over.

  
  
• 
  

  October 30, 2011 at 12:03 AM, said ...

  So what happened with the Harlen Ellison lawsuit?  Obviously, its been released so did the settle out of court? Is he being credited?

• October 29, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Joanne said ...

  Cillian Murphy is still my favourite actor, despite this. He's better than this film. Oh, and Equilibrium is a great film, very underrated.
  

  
  
• 
  

  October 29, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eric said ...

  See I gotta disagree here fellas. I went out and seen this and thought it was Andrew Niccol's best work since Gattaca. I think it was a pretty clever metaphor for the modern day disparity between the rich and poor. The premise and science and all that is just one of those things either you can just go with or you can't. I can see how some people wouldn't care for it though. I would say to people that if you were someone who enjoyed Gattaca and that brand of science fiction then it's worth checking out. 

• October 29, 2011 at 8:36 PM, said ...

  My only question is: Are there any bad time-puns in this?

  
  
• 
  

  October 29, 2011 at 7:07 PM, said ...

  I'MMMMMM HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEREEEE

   

  /fashionablyl8)

• October 29, 2011 at 7:01 PM, said ...

  Once again a trailer with a bad ass premise is thwarted, and I say Logan's Run IS BETTER!

   

  
  
• 
  

  October 29, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Nikhil Sunil said ...

  @Lasse - Thats not true. It was a rumor.
  

• October 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, robert said ...

  i enjoyed it though its a hey look whats on film
  

  
  
• 
  

  October 29, 2011 at 4:40 PM, said ...

  I've read some reviews that gave this movie a lot of points because its premise and setting is aparently a metaphore/satire of the whole OccupyWallStreet movement.

• October 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, said ...

  But korey!! he saw the trailer isn't that enough!?

  
  
• 
  

  October 29, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Valo Palomares said ...

  I thought this was gonna be a Logans Run ripoff.
  
  Still kind of is. But it's a little bit better than that.

Post Comment