300

• 
  

  June 23, 2011 at 10:55 AM, said ...

  I agree with spill, average matiee 

   

  the problem is this  film was start of modern age of Dunnnnnnnnnn films, where all acting, plot and intensity is replaced with CGI, mindless violence and slow mode 

   

  Meaning as film, those who love those films love it, everyone else just sort of sighs......problem is that these films make lot of money with very little effort, so going to keep making them

• July 16, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Chris PIsani said ...

  I give this movie a Full Price because it is amazingly stylish, insanely violent and epic and beautifully executed on top of a great story with a terrific main character played by Gerard Butler in a star-making role.

  
  
• 
  

  May 04, 2010 at 3:09 PM, The Host said ...

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVWDA_06ECk

• February 05, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Greg Rodgers said ...

  Here are some of the reasons I did not like this movie: 1:) the Spartans wore a hell of alot more armor in reality and in fact, they had the most advanced armor at the time which was bronze. 2:) the film completely lost the point of the actual battle. The point of the Battle at Thermopylae was that it was the first time that all of Greece was united under a single banner. 3:) I hated that they replaced the historic ship battle with a typhoon that looked like a fuckin' pastel painting!

  
  
• 
  

  January 19, 2010 at 4:54 PM, john said ...

  weird that they didnt mention the awesome acting in this movie.

• December 22, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Joel Hartney said ...

  Was this their first review

  
  
• 
  

  November 07, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Matt Wisnieski said ...

  This movie really sucked. Too much pointless fighting. Not enough of a plot line, and the little bit of plot they had didnt work very well. I didnt give a shit if the spartans won or lost, i really dont think this should be half as famous as it is.

• June 29, 2009 at 5:40 PM, McAuley said ...

  A wannabe Braveheart in my opinion, That last scene? Exactly the same as Braveheart. But for it's action and style i would give it a Matinee to.

  
  
• 
  

  June 17, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Mike Malesky said ...

  This is definitely a full price film. I don't how anyone can think differently. I think most already consider this a classic. It certainly did alright in the box office. I don't know how anyone can be bored with this. Even if you put it on mute its visually amazing. If you were blind then the music and sound effects should be entertaining by themselves. Yes, the film is ridiculous if you know anything about the actual event. But it doesn't claim to be historically accurate. it claims to be Frank Miller's take on the event which it certainly is. It's a fantasy version of the events. Often times, when warriors would go into battle they would tell stories of glorious battles to rally the men. They would exaggerate and glorify the event into something much more fantastical then it really was. Since this whole movie is being told by Dilios I think it works perfectly.

• February 08, 2009 at 6:52 AM, A Succubus In Rapture said ...

  WOW ppl....this is almost better then sex movie to me!!! Wonderful done in everyway

  
  
• 
  

  February 02, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Oswaldo Castillo Alemán said ...

  renta!!!!

• January 15, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Liam S said ...

  I hate this fucking movie Some ole bullshit

  
  
• 
  

  November 06, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Zudes said ...

  i hate htis movie

• September 30, 2008 at 1:15 AM, Sam Ledbetter said ...

  THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!

  
  
• 
  

  September 28, 2008 at 5:15 AM, cris said ...

  come one everybody this is an excellent movie to see in a theater

• September 05, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Chelor said ...

  dont go watch a movie when you are tired pple... and this movie is just good action! THIS IS SPARTA!!

  
  
• 
  

  July 13, 2008 at 2:55 PM, MiStEr_CritiCizm said ...

  I don't actually believe that you can compare this piece of bullsh*t to great pictures like Braveheart or Gladiator. That were epic movies wich I enjoyed very very much ! What's this ? This is an overhyped comic book movie...Frank Miller-style ! I mean : the guy is absolutely retarded ! The movie is incorrect in almost any way, and i agree with most of the Spill-Reviewers here. If the battle near the Hot Gates really went this way, i'm gonna eat my penis ! However, there ARE some great visual effects in 300, though all the settings were digitally made =S greetz

• July 12, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Matt Fortuna said ...

  You liked this hunk of shit more than gladiator? brave heart is much better than this dialougless sexiest piece of crap

  
  
• 
  

  July 03, 2008 at 2:03 AM, young_FiLmer_200 said ...

  this was Freaking Awesome!!

• June 27, 2008 at 12:55 AM, SHADOWFLA said ...

  I LOVE THIS MOVIE THIS IS ONE OF MY FAVORITES ITS F@$#&$ING GOOD MOVIE

  
  
• 
  

  June 22, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Judyisabel said ...

  These are totally logical questions. I just want some answers :) 1) Who brought the food, water, first aid, extra spears, etc for the Spartans? I certainly didn't see anyone extra other than the 300. I don't think they could be strong enough to fight as well near the end of the movie as in the beginning without at least some water. 2) Xerxes' pyramid that was carried by a lot of men is totally illogical. First of all, how does it turn around? You could see in the movie that it took up the whole passage, either side were steep mountainsides. Imagine that thing trying to do a u-turn in that narrow hell of a space. 3) isn't it a waste of water to kick people in your town's well? Where are you gonna get your water now now that its contaminated with blood?

• June 20, 2008 at 11:20 PM, David said ...

  I got 300(bootleg) slid it into the dvd player and about halfway through the movie I fell asleep(though I watched it all the way through the second time I watched it.). Basically what I'm trying to say is that this movie is very actionpacked but if you've seen it then you know that the dialouge is boring and let's admit it, nerdish. I mean here you have kick ass action scenes but then you would dare to shove a bunch of shitty plotlines in my face, not cool. I really didn't even manage to follow the stroy because I could hardly understand it and it probably would have been better if they just showed me 2 hours of an action sequence because let me tell you the writters for this movie were just sittting down in a big ol' conference room and writing down random lines on paper. To be nice I'll give it a 7/10 just for the awesome action in this movie.

  
  
• 
  

  June 19, 2008 at 1:48 AM, TickleMePink24 said ...

  This movie is perverted but it is very good. I know all the facts behind the film so this to understand for me but it may be more difficult for others.

• April 23, 2008 at 10:58 PM, MyWifeDave said ...

  I really liked this movie. It wasn't very historyically accurate but it worked well with what Frank Miller had put on the page. The action was great and the bullet time worked well. I liked that they used bullet time to immitate some of the comic book scenes without replicating them. I do remember people complaining at the time of release that it was racist and I have no clue as to what they were referring too.

  
  
• 
  

  February 13, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Drain said ...

  (50%)This movie is unusual. It changes a lot from first half and second half. Both have much action, I mean, great action and blood. But the story and the fiction crap is disgusting. They feature a horse smoking a bong(No joke), a guy with Claw arms, and many other fiction things that spoil and degrade what could have been a great movie. On the other side, anytime you see someone fighting, the action sequences and characters are all great. I rate it 50, half for the great action/characters, and half for the degraded fiction/fantasy ruined scenes.

Post Comment