My Bloody Valentine 3D

Review  Trailer

• 
  

  October 27, 2012 at 10:55 PM, said ...

  I rented this (sure Jensan Ackles was okay and the nude woman was fine) and oh boy Carlyle nailed this shit, i could have given it a decent rentel, and by the time this "twist" came, oh good sir, i will give this a FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!

• June 14, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Ryan James Miller said ...

  Fuck this movie!!! I hated the hell out of this movie. It wasn't scary, the 3D bugged the hell out of me, and it was just plain unwatchable. There wasn't a single good thing about this movie. I rented this movie and I couldn't watch it in 2D because there wasn't an option to watch it in 3D. If there was, it must have been hidden because I couldn't find it.

  
  
• 
  

  June 09, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Megan MacAllister said ...

  Now I never saw the original, but I did have the pleasure of seeing this in 3D the weekend it came out. There is officially 1 large theater sized group out there that thinks there's something wrong with me. To see all these blood and guts and junk just kind of flying through the air was funny to me. This is one of those movies that's so bad it's funny. This isn't some thing you'll watch over and over again so if you're interested just watch it once, go for the 3D and don't see it again. And yes, one naked lady doing it, then propped against a wall, then running at you, in 3 no-longer-virginized dimensions.

• June 07, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Mike Malesky said ...

  Pretty lame movie but I'll see just about anything with Jensen Ackles in it because he is THE MAN! For those of you deprived of good television out there you can check out Ackles playing the bad ass character Dean Winchester on Supernatural. That guy is the next big thing waiting to get a big break into movies.

  
  
• 
  

  February 06, 2010 at 5:00 PM, stephen vincent said ...

  THE WORST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN!!! EVER!!! SOME OL BULLSHIT - A BILLION!!!

• October 15, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Mike said ...

  I am already not a big horror fan, however I still went to see this because I haven't seen a 3D movie in a long time, it was pretty cool just to see 3D stuff, but I really wasn't that into the movie. It was a stereotypical horror movie. Matinee. Movie Info http://qanda.encyclopedia.com/category/movies.html

  
  
• 
  

  October 02, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Millionz Knivez said ...

  "8 dollars??? I paid 13 plus 2 dollars for 3D (15 Dollars!) for this crap! The 3D is worthless. They wasted the effect. And the story wasn't even funny to laugh at." Damn straight....I rougly paid $12.50 for my ticket with the glasses...Movie was all hype and sucked....But isn't that what a lot of things are these days? All hype and nothing to show for?

• July 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Freddy said ...

  I found the original boring and so-so. I liked this remake better. I am a huge horror fan, and i liked this film. It was nasty, bloody, very campy, the 3D effects were cool, and the story was some what interesting, and the music score in this was great. And some of the kills, especially the Shovel kill, were some of the best i have seen. That said i am a huge horror fan, i liked this movie a lot for what it was, i just wished they killed more people. A High Matinee for horror fans, a Rental for anyone else.

  
  
• 
  

  July 05, 2009 at 3:29 AM, MattPayneMPA said ...

  Watch it once,enjoy the 3-D,and forget it.Low RENTAL

• May 22, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joseph Maggio said ...

  I thought this movie was good i think it should at least be a low mattine

  
  
• 
  

  April 22, 2009 at 8:01 PM, PaladinDemo said ...

  You got to respect the Mask slashers. I got the original My Bloody Valentine on dvd with the added scenes and you got to watch that with the scenes. With the W.O.D. Slasher book I recommend the original with how a slasher ascends from the ripper to the scourge. This one I'll do it as a Legend Slasher. Not like the Big Horned Guy from Legend, Legend Slashers draw power from their victims who know the stories. Even in 3D, Matinee/Rental/Download.

• March 02, 2009 at 7:29 AM, brendan day said ...

  i have the original on dvd, it bored me.. not enough gore, nudity, sex.. the remake is cooler..

  
  
• 
  

  February 17, 2009 at 1:57 AM, mobious said ...

  This movie was just plan bad!And for you guys that got beat and paid for the 2D...sucks to be you i.had the best mary jane and still was not entertained the movie plot was all too predictable and the effects was on cue with all the other bad 3D movies.It sad that we keep getting sucked into believing that there is quality horror movies out there somewhere i'm just not as easily convinced.If you think this movie is worth the ticket price then i got a Lincoln log you welcomed to watch do the spin for 10 bucks........oh yeah bring your own 3D glasses!

• February 13, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Ic3 said ...

  Well, I finally saw this, in both 3D and 2D, and I got to say, it's pretty shit, but it was a good brain check out. Jensen Ackles is the only reason to see it, great pyscho.

  
  
• 
  

  January 26, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Matt said ...

  8 dollars??? I paid 13 plus 2 dollars for 3D (15 Dollars!) for this crap! The 3D is worthless. They wasted the effect. And the story wasn't even funny to laugh at.

• January 24, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Everett Breckenridge said ...

  The only movies I would like to see in 3-d are: Ghostbusters 1&2 & Star wars ( the original trilogy).

  
  
• 
  

  January 24, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Gordon Freeman said ...

  Turned out exactly as I thought it would: Tons of nudity, gore, 3D, and a really shitty remake. All well, now we just need a movie about a semi-psychotic nerd with an orange suit crowbaring people to death.

• January 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, HardBoild said ...

  This movies sucks as much as the first one and the first one had a random Dukes of Hazzard car ride that came out of no were

  
  
• 
  

  January 23, 2009 at 1:57 PM, cab435 said ...

  Yeah you can only kill someone with a pick like 3 ways but yeah we could add sticking it up there ass lol

• January 22, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Shootguy said ...

  My favorite 3D and nudity.

  
  
• 
  

  January 21, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Kryptoeyez said ...

  Good movie, but nothing to go crazy over. JENSEN ACKLES SURE HELPED!! <3

  

• January 20, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Quantum said ...

  Sorry for the geek moment here but Scooby Doo would be more like "Not Again!" Since he did have to face down the dreaded Miner 49er. Granted he wasn't going around offing people, but if you need someone with with experience with crazy miners there you go.

  
  
• 
  

  January 20, 2009 at 4:09 PM, ladiesman217 said ...

  wow. i cant believe a lot of people didnt like this movie! yeah its campy, but it knows that( a clear example of its self awarenesss was in the very beginning wen that kid was runnin and he hit his head on the wooden beam and got offed by the minor). its a good date movie and an even better crowd movie. and i thought the minor was rly cool. he looked rly iconic and im definately guna be him for halloween! but anyways, this movie would be pretty terrible without 3d. and its a shame that they dont have the technology to bring this type of 3d into homes so the only time to rly experience it like it was meant to be experienced is at the movies...this is guna suffer on home video

• January 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Kitty said ...

  great.... now what is going to brighten up the lonely people this valentine's day.

  
  
• 
  

  January 20, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Shawman1 said ...

  Yes this movie was pretty horrible, but was one helluva good date movie!

Post Comment