Shrek the Third

• 
  

  June 23, 2011 at 10:01 AM, said ...

  thank god I only had to watch this on TV for free (though the electric bill still to much for this) 

   

  this is the embodiment of 'some old bullshit' 

   

  I do not know what insults/incenses me more about this film, fact clearly made for money and so stuck two fingers up at what made the originals classic movies to watch in place of cheap, easy and half-ass'ed production

   

  or

   

  fact that the humour is so bad, that not only did it insult me to watch it, it insulted me that they clearly made this for kids only and even kids should be insulted by this film. 

• January 09, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Hector Fernando Andrade JR. II said ...

  Delete Comment

  Shrek (2001) - An outstanding funny animated comedy movie. Grade A.

  
  Shrek 2 (2004) -  A fantastic animated movie sequel. Grade A+.

  
  Shrek The Thrid (2007) - An entertaining animated movie sequel lacking the ability of eliciting sympathy and tenderness. Grade B.

  
  Shrek Forever After (2010) - A memorable animated movie sequel. Grade B+.

  
  
• 
  

  July 10, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Ryan James Miller said ...

  Some ol bullshit. This movie flat out sucked. The only good thing is one scene when all the girls are fighting. Everything else sucked.

• July 08, 2010 at 11:14 PM, Zeke said ...

  I'd give this a low Full Price. I think this movie is quite underrated, granted it's not as good as the first two but I still got my laughs out of it, Personally I always loved any kind of personality-switching gimmicks regardless how cliché it may be so that added to the lol factor for me however what I really dug with it was that the villians started a rebellion and teared up the city, the way it was developed I thought was just as clever as the other Shreks.

  
  
• 
  

  May 22, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Mathew Seaman said ...

  Matinee. Shrek, Shrek 2, and Shrek Forever After were way better.

• April 15, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Richard Dempsey said ...

  Shrek- FULL PRICE!!! Shrek 2- Low Full Price Shrek the Third- Low Matine. The bad part is, the 4th, looks like a very low rental.

  
  
• 
  

  November 17, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Rohan Ramanujam said ...

  This wasn't bad, but not as good as the first 2 movies. Low Matinee.

• November 01, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Aaron said ...

  Shrek The Halls was much better but it still wasn't all that bad. I'd give it a matinee.

  
  
• 
  

  October 11, 2009 at 5:16 PM, patrick dinan said ...

  full price

• February 11, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Spring said ...

  they should have stuck with 2 and gone to Shrek the halls because this movie was horrible that frog delayed death scene wasn't funny at the first death rattle interuption

  
  
• 
  

  December 20, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Phil said ...

  RENTAL

• October 27, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Jenny said ...

  After two movies with excellent CGI, good writing and talented voice actor, apparently Prince Charming decided to kill the writing staff in hopes of either an ending in which he wins or a movie so bad no one wanted to see him lose again...and we got Door No. #2 with the jackass (not Donkey). This movie was sheer crap on a stick, a half-ass slopjob to rake in more money and continue to lower the I.Q.s of America's youth. Not even Eric Idle's Merlin could save this...in fact a forgetful wizard is a bit too predictable. Wash your hands of this film.

  
  
• 
  

  August 26, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Nick Miracle said ...

  i give it a rental it wasn't all that funny, some characters seemed forced, weak plot. The way the highschoolers talked in this also bugged the f***ing hell outa me. old jokes that've been done before. kept wantin snow white to die along with the other princesses. I like the cast, some of the jokes were okay and i liked that they had the Dragon and Dronkeys. (Dragon/Donkey hybrids.)

• January 23, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Bridget said ...

  I saw this movie in a Guatemalan movie theater last summer, and I didn't even like in in its Spanish form.

  
  
• 
  

  January 21, 2008 at 8:42 PM, michael639 said ...

  the 1st one is better then all of them

• January 13, 2008 at 4:57 AM, Ian said ...

  I saw this movie in french.

  
  
• 
  

  December 29, 2007 at 7:08 PM, TJ David said ...

  Um, this movie is the sam eas all of the other...but make Arthur look guy!

• November 30, 2007 at 3:46 AM, Spring said ...

  the 3rd one is stupid

  
  
• 
  

  November 20, 2007 at 8:13 PM, Russ Palmer said ...

  is he the third shreck or is this the third movie ..joke

• November 20, 2007 at 4:47 AM, Gift of the Magi said ...

  oy...After two movies with excellent CGI, good writing and talented voice actor, apparently Prince Charming decided to kill the writing staff in hopes of either an ending in which he wins or a movie so bad no one wanted to see him lose again...and we got Door No. #2 with the jackass (not Donkey). This movie was sheer crap on a stick, a half-ass slopjob to rake in more money and continue to lower the I.Q.s of America's youth. Not even Eric Idle's Merlin could save this...in fact a forgetful wizard is a bit too predictable. Wash your hands of this film.

  
  
• 
  

  November 19, 2007 at 6:19 AM, Kenny said ...

  They always do this with kids movies, they know kids will love any old crap. So they resurrect a dieing movie, put together all the characters and predictable events they can think of, and hope that they'll come up with something good. Funny review though "Who hasn't gone home with a girl like Fiona before?" I laughed so hard at that. You guys should make movies, not review 'em.

• November 18, 2007 at 7:34 PM, Alicia Marie Livingston said ...

  I really disliked this movie. The only thing that I found I remotely liked was the crazy wizard if i remember correctly. And you're all right= it's about money. I do a whole of a hell lot of stocking shrek the third dvds every night. Delete Comment

  
  
• 
  

  November 18, 2007 at 3:00 AM, Rusty Shackelford said ...

  Please resubmit more old ones

• November 18, 2007 at 1:06 AM, Alex said ...

  I like the first one better.

  
  
• 
  

  November 18, 2007 at 12:11 AM, dmitri said ...

  ok

Post Comment